Our Work in Public Policy and Institutional Development
We monitor regulatory developments and provide evidence-based analysis to inform policies that strengthen information integrity, platform accountability, and institutional transparency.
Digital Services and Platform Regulation
We analyze the implementation of regulations such as the Digital Services Act and monitor platform compliance with regulatory frameworks at local, national, European, and international levels, providing evidence on their effectiveness and areas for improvement.
- → DSA implementation analysis
- → Content moderation standards monitoring
- → Systemic risks framework assessment
AI Governance and Transparency
We research the responsible development and deployment of artificial intelligence systems, especially in content recommendation and automated analysis, contributing to the debate on algorithmic transparency.
- → AI Act compliance analysis
- → Algorithmic transparency in recommendation systems
- → Automated decision-making assessment
Protection of Information Integrity
We develop and analyze strategies to strengthen information integrity while protecting fundamental rights and freedom of expression, based on evidence about which measures are effective.
- → Evaluation of strategies for information integrity
- → Media literacy framework analysis
- → Information crisis response protocols
Media Literacy and Education
We promote the integration of media literacy and critical thinking skills in educational curricula and public awareness campaigns, contributing to the development of national frameworks.
- → Contribution to national media literacy strategies
- → Development of educator training programs
- → Design of public awareness campaigns
Documents and Reports
Access our reports and resources on public policy, regulatory analysis, and position papers that provide evidence.
DANA and floods in Spain: Platforms Response during a Crisis
Report assessing the response of TikTok, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, WhatsApp, LinkedIn, and Telegram to the disinformation crisis that followed the DANA (the Spanish acronym for depresión aislada en niveles altos, a high-altitude isolated depression), a weather phenomenon that caused severe flooding in Valencia and other eastern regions of Spain on 29 October 2024.
DownloadTelegram Public Channels: Influence, unmitigated risks and recommendations
The document analyses the role of public Telegram channels in the spread of disinformation and how the platform’s design facilitates the creation of communities built around harmful content, with limited moderation and high levels of interaction between channels.
DownloadPlatform Response to Disinformation during the EU Election 2024
Analysis of how major platforms responded to more than 1,300 debunked pieces of content related to the 2024 European elections. The report shows that YouTube and X took little to no action on most of the content, compared to a stronger response from Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok, in line with their obligations under the Digital Services Act.
DownloadREGULATING DISINFORMATION: RISKS AND OPPORTUNITIES
This document provides an overview of the fight against disinformation, addressing the challenges and limitations of its regulation, as well as the responsibilities of major digital platforms and of individuals, companies, and institutions.
DownloadShowing 9-12 of 12
Standards for Advocacy, Public Policy and Lobbying Activities
Our public policy work is guided by strict ethical standards and principles of transparency. We maintain the highest levels of integrity in all our institutional interactions.
-
1
Transparency and Disclosure
We fully disclose our funding sources, policy positions, and institutional relationships. All lobbying activities are duly registered and documented according to applicable regulations.
-
2
Evidence-Based Advocacy
Our policy recommendations are based on rigorous research, data analysis, and expert consultation. We provide decision-makers with accurate and verified information.
-
3
Non-Partisan Approach
We maintain strict political neutrality and engage with all relevant stakeholders regardless of their political affiliation. Our focus is on evidence-based policy solutions.
-
4
Conflict of Interest Management
We identify and manage potential conflicts of interest through clear protocols and disclosure mechanisms, ensuring our advocacy remains independent and credible.
-
5
Respectful Engagement
We engage with institutional representatives in a professional and respectful manner, following established protocols and demonstrating courtesy in all interactions.
-
6
Public Interest Focus
All our advocacy efforts are directed at promoting the public interest, democratic values, and the common good, rather than narrow sectoral interests.
Get Regulatory Updates Affecting Information Integrity Straight to Your Inbox
What will you receive each month?
- ✓ DSA and AI Act implementation analysis
- ✓ Monitoring of critical platform decisions
- ✓ Insights based on our fact-checking experience
- ✓ Early access to our research reports
Contact Us
Interested in information integrity policies? Get in touch.